Good comments for research paper
WebReaders do not need coercive comments and often resent them. If you have presented the details, trust your readers to have the right reactions. 11. Reach independent conclusions. A good paper demonstrates both thorough research and independent analysis. Never simply tie a series of block quotes together and try to pass it off as a research paper! WebThank you What a stylish paper! Thank you for getting right to work. What careful work! Thank you for such a fine effort . What neat work! That looks like it's going to be a good …
Good comments for research paper
Did you know?
WebAgain, the paper shows a good grasp of some of the basic points made in the literature, weaving together a number of overlapping ideas. I’m confident in your ability to improve. James. General feedback: The following is an example of the general feedback given in the wake of a recent “ordinary”paper assignment. Although given in response ... WebJun 2, 2024 · Unlike essays, research papers usually divide the body into sections with separate headers to facilitate browsing and scanning. Use the divisions in your outline as …
WebSep 6, 2016 · Keep to the facts. Stay polite, but keep emotion out of it. If the reviewers comment is not well founded in fact, it should be quite easy to give a successful response. If you think the paper does not require a change, give a brief explanation with supporting references or data. http://cord01.arcusapp.globalscape.com/comments+on+research+paper
WebGeneral Comments from Reviewer 1 Comment: This is an interesting study and the authors have collected a unique dataset using cutting edge methodology. The paper is … WebSep 11, 2024 · Comment 1: It is clear that the authors know a good deal more about medieval manuscripts than about seamanship, but the manuscript is worthy of …
WebApr 9, 2024 · 17 Research Proposal Examples. By Chris Drew (PhD) / April 9, 2024. A research proposal systematically and transparently outlines a proposed research project. The purpose of a research proposal is to demonstrate a project’s viability and the researcher’s preparedness to conduct an academic study. It serves as a roadmap for the …
WebFeb 7, 2024 · ‘the authors’ have a clear research question and use appropriate methods, but their data are not suitable to provide an answer to their research question. Without additional data collection, this paper is not appropriate for publication’. 3. The rest of your review should provide detailed comments about the manuscript. christ rising from the graveWebOct 28, 2024 · Intermix positive and negative comments. It’s usually best to begin with a positive comment about the paper, then mention a criticism, then another positive, and … gfr weight basedWebDec 11, 2024 · The comment usually refers to a criticism in the journal that published the wrong paper. When I started, the journal editor was expected to publish them: it was a … gfr welche formelWebNov 3, 2024 · 3. I sent my Review Paper to a journal and it took almost 4 months to respond to me. In the first decision, the reviewers suggested some revisions. Their comments on … gfr wert laborWebSep 11, 2024 · A Sample Response to the Comments of Peer Reviewers. Edward Researcher. Palaeography Institute. 1717 Writer’s Lane. South River, MI, USA, 484848. 734-734-7344. [email protected]. Dr Helen … chris tritico fox 26WebReviewer Comments to Author(s): Reviewer #1 (Jillon Vander Wal, PhD): Overall, this is a clear, concise, and well-written manuscript. The introduction is relevant and theory based. Sufficient information about the previous study findings is presented for readers to follow the present study rationale and procedures. chris tritico daughter killedWebtexts is not judged as sufficient for a research paper. Yes, your thoughts should be well-founded and grounded in socio-historical context where relevant, but the point of a … gfr weather