2024 Efe v ashcroft

Efe v ashcroft

Author: hrdu

August undefined, 2024

WebMansour v. INS, 230 F.3d 902, 905 (7th Cir. 2000); Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 903 (5th Cir. 2002) ("We give great deference to an immigration judge's decisions regarding an alien's credibility."). We require that an adverse credibility finding merely be supported by "specific, cogent reasons" that "bear a legitimate nexus to the finding ... WebApr 9, 2003 · Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899 (5th Cir. 2002); Barreto-Claro v. United States Attorney Gen., 275 F.3d 1334 (11th Cir. 2001). These cases reaffirm the importance, as …

348 F3d 1153 Farah v. Ashcroft OpenJurist

WebJun 20, 2002 · On August 2, 1999, the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board" or "BIA") remanded Efe's case to the immigration court for proceedings on the Convention Against … WebNo. 15-60761 3 380 F.3d 788, 79293— (5th Cir. 2004), to hold that the “nuclear family” does not constitute a cognizable “social group.” dr sally boonville mo

Josh Muligan vs Efe Ambrose - Porównanie statystyk zawodników …

WebApr 21, 2004 · See Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 906 (5th Cir. 2002). The BIA's finding regarding credibility was based on a "reasonable interpretation of the record and … WebCA5 CAT Remand: Abushagif v. Garland. Abushagif v. Garland. "Abushagif contends that the BIA abused its discretion by entirely failing to address his CAT claim. On that point, he is correct. A CAT “claim is separate from . . . claims for asylum and withholding of removal and should receive separate analytical attention.”. Efe v. WebApr 9, 2003 · Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899 (5th Cir.2002); Barreto-Claro v. United States Attorney Gen., 275 F.3d 1334 (11th Cir.2001). These cases reaffirm the importance, as required by regulation, of the applicant's receiving an opportunity to explain any discrepancies in the testimony before a finding of frivolousness — permanently barring … colonial beach va trolley

emaf evitceted fo eflow Crossword Clue Wordplays.com

CA5 CAT Remand: Abushagif v. Garland - Inside News

WebKenneth Efe, Petitioner, v. John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent, 293 F.3d 899 (5th Cir. 2002) Annotate this Case. US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - 293 F.3d 899 (5th Cir. 2002) June 20, 2002. Morton Sklar (argued), World Organization Against Torture USA, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. ... WebNov 22, 2006 · See, e.g., Zhang v. Gonzales, 432 F.3d at 344; Faddoul, 37 F.3d at 188; see also Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 906 (5th Cir.2002) (writing that an applicant for withholding of removal must show "'it is more likely than not' that his life or freedom would be threatened by persecution" (quoting 8 C.F.R. § 208.16(b)(1))). Although the standard ... colonial beach weather vaWebEfe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899 (5th Cir. 2002); Barreto-Claro v. United States Attorney Gen., 275 F.3d 1334 (11th Cir. 2001). These cases reaffirm the importance, as required by regulation, of the applicant's receiving an opportunity to explain any discrepancies in the testimony before a finding of frivolousness — permanently barring ... dr sally box

"WebEFE v. ASHCROFT United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Jun 20, 2002; Subsequent References; CaseIQ TM (AI Recommendations) EFE v. ASHCROFT. 293 F.3d 899. … " - Efe v ashcroft

Efe v ashcroft

Avelar-Oliva v. Barr, 954 F.3d 757 Casetext Search + Citator

Webevidence. Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 903 (5th Cir. 2002). The substantial-evidence standard requires only that the BIA’s decision be based on the evidence presented and that the decision be substantially reasonable. Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS, 78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996). The BIA’s finding that Sohmani failed to show that he suffered WebJun 7, 2004 · In addition, Thuri requested withholding of removal under § 241 of the INA, 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3)(A), which is available on similar grounds but requires a more stringent showing that the alien will probably be persecuted if removed to a certain country, see Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 906 (5th Cir. 2002). Finally, Thuri applied for relief ...

Did you know?

WebPetitioners argue that, as a matter of law, CAT claims are raised every time an applicant files for asylum or withholding of removal under INA § 241 (b) (3) (B). We do not agree. A claim under the CAT is a separate claim from withholding of removal under the INA. Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 906-07 (5th Cir. 2002). WebJul 21, 2004 · Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 906-07 (5th Cir.2002). Moreover, regulatory language indicates that applicants must demonstrate some specific intent to raise a claim for CAT relief. Title 8, C.F.R. § 208.18(b) states that “[a]n alien who is in exclusion, deportation, or removal proceedings on or after March 22, 1999 may apply for withholding ...

WebJun 20, 2002 · Efe v. Ashcroft, No. 01-60314. Document Cited authorities 28 Cited in 360 Precedent Map Related. Vincent. Court: United States Courts of Appeals. United States … WebKenneth Efe is a Nigerian citizen who attempted entry into the United States in January 1998. His testimony regarding the circumstances that brought him to the U.S. changed …

WebJul 25, 2014 · at 432; see also Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d at 906 (finding that killing a police officer at a political demonstration was a serious nonpolitical crime because the conduct … WebThe Crossword Solver found answers to emaf evitceted fo eflow crossword clue. The Crossword Solver finds answers to classic crosswords and cryptic crossword puzzles. …

WebNov 14, 2003 · Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899 (5th Cir.2002); Barreto-Claro v. United States Attorney Gen., 275 F.3d 1334 (11th Cir.2001). These cases reaffirm the importance, as required by regulation, of the applicant's receiving an opportunity to explain any discrepancies in the testimony before a finding of frivolousness-permanently barring …

WebJun 20, 2002 · Opinion for Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. colonial beach virginia weather forecastWebJun 7, 2004 · In addition, Thuri requested withholding of removal under § 241 of the INA, 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3)(A), which is available on similar grounds but requires a more … colonial beach weather 22443WebMay 6, 2004 · See Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 905-06 (5th Cir. 2002) (demonstrator's attack and killing of police officer at a political rally was disproportionate to his political objectives). Chay-Velasquez did not carry his burden to prove that the serious nonpolitical crime preclusion should not apply to his case. colonial beach va weather forecastWebApr 3, 2024 · Wang v. Ashcroft, 260 F.3d 448, 452 (5th Cir. 2001). This exhaustion requirement applies to all issues for which an administrative remedy is available to a petitioner "as of right." Omari v. ... 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984) ; Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 903–04 (5th Cir. 2002). If the statute is "silent or ambiguous with respect to the specific ... colonial beach va water billWebEfe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899 (5th Cir. 2002); Barreto-Claro v. United States Attorney Gen., 275 F.3d 1334 (11th Cir. 2001). These cases reaffirm the importance, as required by … colonial beach vocational technical centerWebMorton Sklar (argued), World Organization Against Torture USA, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Patrick P. Shen (argued), U.S. Dept. of Justice, Immigration Litigation ... colonial beach virginia zillowWebJun 20, 2002 · Efe v. Ashcroft, No. 01-60314. Document Cited authorities 28 Cited in 360 Precedent Map Related. Vincent. Court: United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit) Writing for the Court: Clement: Citation: 293 F.3d 899: Parties: Kenneth EFE, Petitioner, v. colonial beach va weather today